CNN Just Proved Russia DID NOT Have Any Influence With Clinton's Loss

Liberals, in their quest to defend Clinton, and discredit Trump's win, suggesting she "won" the election (had it not been for that pesky Electoral College) just proved they've again been pushing fake news about Russia.

For over a month progressives (closet communists) have been ranting like banshees that Russia hacked and influenced the election in Trump's favor. Uh huh... well if the Russians influenced the election for Trump then why did Clinton win popular vote?! If the fake news was true that Russia had such an effect on the election then Trump should have won the popular and electoral vote. Where is any proof of this interference from Russia that hurt Clinton? Based on the lefts arguments Russia helped Hillary win the popular vote and it was only because she ignored campaigning key Electoral College/ flyover states she lost.

You people on the left aren't too smart are you? What you've just done CNN, is prove you've been shoveling F A K E   N E W S (aka bullshit) since Nov 8th!

Hey Mark Zuckerberg if you want to censor fake news why don't you start with CNN?

---

It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
CNN- More Americans voted for Hillary Clinton than any other losing presidential candidate in US history.
The Democrat outpaced President-elect Donald Trump by almost 2.9 million votes, with 65,844,954 (48.2%) to his 62,979,879 (46.1%), according to revised and certified final election results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Clinton's 2.1% margin ranks third among defeated candidates, according to statistics from US Elections Atlas. Andrew Jackson won by more than 10% in 1824 but was denied the presidency, which went to John Quincy Adams. In 1876, Samuel Tilden received 3% more votes than Rutherford B. Hayes, who eventually triumphed by one electoral vote...more