Russia Warship Headed Towards US Navy Destroyers Following Missile Strike

Posturing and an act of intimidation is the only motive at this point for Russia to send a warship into the eastern Mediterranean between Syria and US destroyers that fired Tomahawk missiles last night. Putin is an ally of Assad because Russia has interest in Syria's seaport as well as a gas pipeline.

The Russians couldn't careless about Syrian civilians getting wiped out by chemical weapons. Weapons that Syria is not suppose to have, that were supposed to have been turned over to Russia! (Thank you for lying they were Susan Rice and John Kerry). If Assad is removed from power, which Sec Tillerson has made clear, Russia's interests will be in question. It would be in Putin's best interest to join the civilized world to see Assad removed from power, replaced with someone who will uphold their interests but also bring an end to this civil war.

Instead, Putin chooses to puff his chest that will lead to a standoff in the Med as Russia has apparently disconnected the "deconfliction" line with the US. Now our troops on the ground will have no warning of impending Russian military activity. Do not be surprised to hear about "friendly fire" incident between the US and Russia. This is Putin's way of testing Pres Trump, who should pull out troops out of Syria immediately if this line remains disconnected.

If you're wondering or are still in doubt, after people like Mark Levin have issued warnings, yes we are in the early stages of WWIII!

Michigan Man Posts Video Expecting to Die in Standoff With Police Over Property Dispute

This video is a cry for help. This is a complex case I do not know the whole story. What I do know is that the police/ sheriffs in many parts of the US have become tax enforcers and collectors for banks. They will act on an order regardless of the legal fight an individual may be engaged in vs giving it time.

The reason I am sharing this is in hopes for someone with a strong legal background can step in put the brakes on whatever is in process before chaos erupts. Is there anyone in the many Constitutional legal foundations (The Rutherford Institute, Landmark Legal, American Center for Law and Justice etc or the like) out there that can step in and help Ted Visner?

Ted Visner just posted this video today to give an explanation to his situation over the eviction and laws on foreclosure stressing he has been denied due process.

Visner's Youtube page

Cliven Bundy Responds to His Controversial Negro & Slavery Statements

Bundy has been under fire for his racial statements that folks are tired of hearing about by now. Does his beliefs on race, right or wrong, matter in this case/ battle with the feds? The issue still at hand that gained most peoples support was over the govts overreach and abuse of power towards private citizens.

Let's assume Bundy is a hardcore racist, does that mean it's okay for the feds to march in a small army to enforce a court order pointing guns at Bundy's family and supporters over cattle grazing fees? Is the govt/ BLM the good guys now for seizing land because Bundy "often wondered" if blacks were better off as slaves vs under the thumb of govt bureaucracy?

If Bundy's or anyones beliefs on race do matter when the battle is over an out of control govt why? Why does ones beliefs on race matter when the bigger picture of their battle our battle is about a govt out of control seizing land, taking property and the use of excessive force? Where do you draw the line in supporting someone once you learn about their other beliefs? You may vehemently disagree with someone on an issue but if they are under attack for something you too could fall victim of do you abandon them over the disagreement? Most people will agree guys like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton are hardcore racists but if the govt was moving to silence them seizing property do you stand down? Remember that same attack and abuse of power used towards your enemies may someday be used against you! Yes we have to know who and what we are standing with and there are instances where you have to distance yourself from people disconnected or unhinged but if there is a fundamental issue which affects or will affect many do you abandon the cause?

MSDNCs, Mike Barnicle: Harry Reid is Right Cliven Bundy is a Domestic Terrorist

All parties right or left should be coming forward demanding Reid make a formal apology for calling Americans expressing their First Amendment right in support of another American domestic terrorists. In allowing this vile miserable excuse of a human being to use such language waters down the meaning of what a domestic terrorist is. The Boston Bombers, Timothy McVeigh, Nidal Hasan are domestic terrorists not Americans who have had it with an abusive federal government. This Barnicle charter in his arrogance doesn't realize that in the manner he defined terrorists he also has to include those on the left who use the same exact tactics the Bundy protestors use.. that means his precious Occupy Wall St movement along with the countless radial left groups from the gay mafia to CodePink are all domestic terrorists as well!!

Leftist hacks like Barnicle always leave out what their own do and want to immediately tag any act of civil disobedience committed by the right as terrorism. Sorry pal it doesn't work that way. You and Reid want to push it fine then it goes for all the lefty loon organizations including those like yourself to Soros and even politicians who offer support. You cannot pick and choose who you will label. But do we her anyone on the right as of now saying what I just said NO! Why because they're a bunch cowards who insist on playing nice. Look where it gets them, now labeled anarchists, arsonists and terrorists!