Dem Congresswoman Wants the UN to Monitor the 2020 Elections

Rep Barbara Lee fielded a question about voter suppression(?) at She The People 2020 that the right wing is trying to marginalize those who would vote for the progressive agenda. She stressed the need to ensure voter ID laws are not enacted and "personally want to ask the UN to come in" to monitor American elections.

The UN has no legal authority to monitor US elections, Americans do not want anything to do with this useless world body. Let's assume they were honest and did monitor our elections, they would uncover rampant election fraud committed by the democrats anyway. But we live in reality where it's safe to assume, voter fraud would be far worse if this organization was involved.

Why does Lee want to stop voter ID laws? It has nothing to do with voter suppression or racism, it has to do with stopping people vote multiple times as well as stopping illegals from voting that the democrat party relies on.

Lee and her race hustling ilk don't have a problem with an ID being required to:
buy or rent a car
drive a car
buy or rent a home
get utilities
rent a PO Box
take out a loan
open a bank account
buy alcohol and tobacco products
gamble in a casino
get into a club or bar
get on a plane
buy a gun (hell they want intrusive background checks)
cash a check
pay by check or credit card
enter a gated community/ condos or the like
get medical care
buy insurance
applying for govt/ social assistance (food stamps to Social Security etc)
get a hotel/ motel room
get public housing
get a passport

....the list is endless. How can one be suppressed for providing ID to vote but not when it comes to providing ID to buy booze or get govt assistance??

Voter suppression is a myth created by the Left to steal elections.

If the UN steps foot to on US soil to monitor ;) our elections, especially when democrats are desperate to win don't be surprised if Americans revolt. The People will never allow this organization to operate on US soil... it would get quite messy and we'll leave it there.

Daily Beast Hack Claims Trump Election Commission Will Suppress Votes

The Daily Beasts Jonathan Alter spewed left-wing nonsense attacking Trump's election commission on voter fraud. It's abundantly clear the Left wants to take every step possible to deny voter fraud exists. They wrote the book on it, their people are the ones caught 99% of the time committing it, yet any attempt to investigate and put a stop to it is turned into crazy conspiracy. Alter calls Trump's commission a "voter suppression commission" which will "hold down democrat votes" and "rig" things for the next election!

Democrats want oversight and hand in everything, every aspect of our lives yet when it comes to the voting booth they want the wild west! Trump wants to find out what happened in the 2016 election as to how so many voted illegally with the hopes of preventing it.

Nailing this down is how you stop a country from becoming a Banana Republic, it's not election rigging. Dems know the only answer to curb voter fraud is requiring ID's to vote. We know where they go with this but none of it is legit since you need an ID to do just about anything anymore, and no it isn't racist or bigoted to require an ID. Countless nations do it and no one has a problem with it. We want to protect the legitimacy of our elections but its a crime to require ID. Fine then stop asking for ID when people buy booze, tobacco products, enter a club, gamble, rent/buy a home or car, get medical care etc etc etc.

Democrats you can't have your cake and eat it too. Obama isn't POTUS anymore to waive laws and regs for your lawlessness. Oh and Jonathan the US is NOT a democracy, ruled by mob mentality, it is a Republic, governed by the rule of law.

Yes, There is Voter Fraud

Anyone claiming there isn't voter fraud is a fraud! First the media was up in arms when Trump made the claim, now they're having a fit because he wants an investigation! Funny, don't recall them throwing a fit when obama ordered an investigation!

Can we talk about Jill Stein for a minute? She launched multiple failed recount attempts where all we learned is that Trump got more votes OR there were more votes in a district than there were voters. Explain that one fake news media? Imagine what would have been revealed had she continued this futile attempt in other states.

Voter fraud in a state like California, carrying a large umber of Electoral College votes, is highly possible and easy! Anyone can walk into a polling location, give a name of a registered voter, sign the ledger next to the name given and they will be handed a ballot no questions asked. As a resident of CA I can attest to this as fact, where I even offered my ID and it was rejected "that's not necessary".

How many people are registered to vote (alive or dead) but don't where nefarious people, doing a little homework, can acquire a list of registered voters to commit fraud by using their names? According to Pew Research there are 1.8 million dead people still registered, 2.75M are registered in more than 1 state too. Is it not plausible there are that many if not more of living registered voters who don't vote?!

Trump's estimate of 3-5M doesn't seem so far fetched anymore does it?

Let's stop with the nonsense that there isn't voter fraud, it's happened in the past and surely happened in 2016. You want to end it and stop the bickering? Then require an ID to vote, other nations including Mexico do it and we don't hear anyone calling any of them racist over it.

Those who don't want voter ID are the ones who want and encourage voter fraud.

SCOTUS Denying Case Upholds Decision States Can't Force Voters to Prove Citizenship

Here is more proof that the US is on an unavoidable course to disaster. We are a post-Constitutional Republic where a group of 9 unelected individuals are now making law, becoming another arm of the progressive movement. This time around the Politburo (formerly Supreme Court) by not hearing a case have upheld a 2014 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that "would-be voters need only swear under penalty of perjury that they are citizens" vs providing proof of citizenship.

I don't have a long winded response to yet another blow to this nation by the Politburo. Instead I present to you this video from the 2012 election demonstrating EXACTLY what is going to happen on a massive scale in 2016 thanks to the non-action of the Politburo.

This country is done. Once gain I call on those of you in brass to uphold the oath you took. I shouldn't have to but I will remind each and every one of you that you took an oath to God and Country not man(men) and government.



Voting-Rights Advocates Get Win at Supreme Court
by Simone Pathé | Roll Call
Monday’s big election law news came from the Supreme Court’s penultimate decision of the term upholding Arizona’s congressional districts.

But before handing down its last three decisions, the court made voting-rights advocates happy by deciding not to review a different election case.

“Arizona citizens can continue to participate in voter registration drives without worrying about not having proof of citizenship documents,” Shirley Sandelands, of the League of Women Voters of Arizona, said in a statement Monday.

The case, Kobach, et al. v. Election Assistance Commission, et al., was about whether Arizona and Kansas could require voters to prove their citizenship when registering to vote with the so-called “federal form.” Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach led the suit against the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, which was an appeal of a lower court decision.

Both Kansas and Arizona have state laws that require applicants to prove their citizenship when applying to vote with state forms (for state or federal elections). But the U.S. EAC denied the states’ requests to have their citizenship laws applied when would-be voters use the standardized federal form.

The Supreme Court had already ruled in 2013 that state proof-of-citizenship laws couldn’t be applied when people try to register with the federal form. The states’ direct request to the EAC was a last-ditch effort to get around that.

By not hearing the case, the Supreme Court effectively upheld the decision of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled against Arizona and Kansas in November 2014, saying the EAC did not have to modify its form to meet state laws. Under the federal form, would-be voters need only swear under penalty of perjury that they are citizens...more

Obama Accusing GOP Of Making It Harder For People To Vote

The master of divide and conquer spreading more lies at the nation racist convention! There is NO voter suppression, hell there were an extra 35,000 voters in North Carolina if I recall? Obama and his radical ilk like Sharpton and Lewis know calling people racists wins them more political power stopping laws to require voters have ID. So in typical Alinsky fashion they keep hammering away because people are afraid to engage them for fear of being called a racist. So Ill make it easy for you president CRYBABY, I am RACIST because I am in favor of voter ID law. However I do have a solution to this problem which will nullify the whole debate both sides could agree on, but we will leave that for another day!

Let's be honest America the boy king and his enablers do not want people to produce ID when they vote because he likes it when there is 110% voter turnout, the dead and cartoon characters vote. He knows with the coming midterm election and how pissed off everyone is in the country with DC a lot of people will be voting threatening his power. His majesty and the demoncrats need all the living, dead and fictional bodies they can muster to show up at the polls.