Ginsburg and Biden in 2016: President Has Constitutional Right to Fill SCOTUS Vacancy Before Election

  Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Joe Biden in 2016 in their own words made the argument the President and Senate have the legal Constitutional right to move forward to fill the SCOTUS vacancy before the election. Oddly none of that seems to matter to the democrats now, they hate that videos like these are being dug up using their own words to support Pres Trump.. kinda makes their hopes of impeaching him for following the law hard!   There is time to fill the vacancy, and it must be done ASAP knowing the chaos democrats will cause with this election. If you don't know, democrats are now pushing, and have already got rulings in their favor, that ballots cane be mailed in AFTER the election, in some cases up to 6 days later! Yea so the election doesn't go the way they want, so print out some more ballots and mail them in to change the results and YOU'LL ACCEPT THE END RESULT! This is how stupid and obedient the democrats think you are, knowing right now they intend to challenge the results and steal this election. The only way to beat them is to vote in-person casting more votes for Trump than what obama got in 2008, which means at least 70M of you are goign to have to vote for Trump and the GOP for that matter! The ball is in your court to make sure any attempt democrats make to steal this election futile. Get as many people as you know out to the polls Nov 3rd, because the dems are going to be running their ballot printing press day and night!

Ginsburg: Amend the Constitution to Guarantee ‘Equal Rights’ For Women

Did we miss something? What are these rights feminists are screaming like banshees over that women in the United States don't have? What are these equal rights women are being denied in America where a sitting US Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, feels so compelled a change to the Constitution has to be made!?

Right off the top, let's get it out of the way - ladies can you walk into Planned Parenthood today and get an abortion? YES
Can women drive cars? Yes
Can married women walk out their house without the need to ask their husband for permission? Yes
Are women (in the broad sense because there are abusive relationships) considered property in America? NO
Can women own businesses? Yes
Can women hold political office at any level? Yes
Do American laws give men/ husband the right to hit their wives to keep them in line? NO
In some cases (this is quite loaded not to be debated today) do women make more money than men? YES
Can women be CEO's of major corporations? YES
Can a woman come up with a great idea and turn it into a multi-million dollar business? Yes
Do women have the opportunity to go to college, going as far as getting a PhD in the filed of their choice? Yes
Can women go to the police if they have been assaulted without fear of being prosecuted for being the victim? Yes
Can women walk out of the house without being covered up in a burka? YES
Can women cover their bodies in tattoos and piercings? Yes
Can women buy alcohol, tobacco products, guns and other restricted items children cannot?! Yes
Can women vote? YES

This list could go on and on but the fact of the matter is women have all the same rights men enjoy in America. There are areas where there is abuse, but usually when light is put on the problem, especially today, it gets squashed quickly. This kind of talk from Ginsburg and feminists creates problems instead of fixing them. This rant of hers is just divisive, we know things weren't perfect 100's of years ago, but to suggest we're still there and an amendment is needed is absurd.

The US Constitution has the equal rights provision within it. When it says "all men" it is inclusive to all men including those of the female persuasion because woMEN! With respect to the Founders, were against slavery doing what they could to change things. Unfortunately it took another 100 years to rid the old ways out of America's way of life. America is not perfect, but it's a better place to live than the shitholes around the world, where many of the bullet points above are based on!!

Judge Pirro Calls For Ruth Bader Ginsburg to be Impeached

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is one of if not the most hardcore of radical leftist judges to ever be appointed. Whether you like Trump or not what she said about him was unprofessional and her little pathetic apology isn't good enough. FTR she made said apology because she's violated protocol, more specifically Ethical Canons under the Code of Conduct!

Canon 1: A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary
Canon 2: A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities
Canon 3: A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Fairly, Impartially and Diligently
Canon 4: A Judge May Engage in Extrajudicial Activities That are Consistent With the Obligations of Judicial Office
Canon 5: A Judge Should Refrain From Political Activity

If this had been Justice Alito or Justice Thomas criticizing Clinton you know democrats would be in the streets demanding their heads right now making the BLM look like a church choir!

It's time for republicans to stop playing nice and demand this clearly tainted justice to resign or be impeached for ethical violations. SCOTUS' integrity (what's left of it) and that of the USA is on the line as Ginsburg cannot be trusted to remain "impartial".