Sen Murphy Claims Trump's Rhetoric Could Lead to Terrorist Attack

Only hardcore progressives can come up with such nonsense that a sitting Presidents rhetoric will set off a pack of monsters on innocent children. Dems solution to dealing with terrorists is to put your head in the sand while talking nice about them. They prefer appeasing a death cult rather than killing them. This attitude is why we have all these attacks around the world.

It is way past time to bring the fight to these monsters. Terrorists couldn't careless about the US or our allies being nice, they hate our very existence. They hate western culture because it shows those under their boot that you don't have to live like a slave. Women don't have to be covered up, uneducated, and sex toys. Children can grow up doing whatever they want. Radical islam HATES FREEDOM... So Sen Murphy you going to trash America to appease the islamists? Btw go over to their backyard and preach the "love" you show for them in the US and see what happens!

Dems Murphy and Waters Admit There is No Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion

Two of the biggest loudmouths pushing the conspiracy theory of Trump-Russian collusion should get themselves in check after admitting there's no evidence. After almost a year of this utter nonsense if there was evidence it would have surfaced by now... especially with all the leaks from obama loyalists in the deep state.

Just so everyone is up to speed on dem logic they want people to believe Hillary had the election locked up. But then because she maintained an unsecure email server, the DNC got hacked and John Podesta fell for a phishing scam where emails were made public that was enough to make voters flip their vote to Trump!
The Fact that she is/was a lousy candidate, riddled in scandals and corruption, heartless, lied about everything wasn't the reason she lost. No the Russians made people vote for Trump even though there isn't one shred of proof.

Democrats are not very bright either. Do these two and their ilk realize this investigation they so desperately want will also include Hillary and obama! So yes, let's have an investigation to see what deals they made to enrich themselves through that Uranium One deal alone. Let's not stop there, let's also look into Schumer, Pelosi and others who have met with Putin too!

Careful what you wish for dems you might just get it

Senator WARNS Under New AUMF President Can Declare International Martial Law

This is unreal please make the time to watch to this and understand the warning from Sen Murphy.

McConnell, Graham... THE PROGRESSIVES aka ESTABLISHMENT are fast-tracking the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) that will allow the president to deploy troops anywhere in the world. Sen Christopher Murphy went a step further saying this will allow the president (be it obama, Trump, Clinton ???) the power to declare International Martial Law to fight terror! Now before you start shaking your head in agreement consider who has been deemed terrorists: ISIS, al Qaeda, Hamas..... TEA Partiers, Conservatives, Right-Wingers, Left-Wingers etc!!

"This resolution is a total rewrite of the war powers clause of the United States Constitution. Let's be clear about that. It is essentially a declaration of international martial law,a sweeping transfer of military power to the president that will allow him or her to send US troops almost anywhere in the world, for almost any reason with absolutely no limitations.

...the language of this resolution is dangerous and it is unprecedented.

...even worse the language doesn't even require ISIS to be present in a country for the president to invade. All that is necessary for the president to be able to argue with a straight face is that the threat of ISIS was present. What was seen here in the United States the threat of ISIS is present in virtually every corner in the world thus this resolution would give the president total absolute carte blanche to send our young soldiers to any corner of the world without consulting Congress.

...this resolution, as it's currently written, would do exactly the opposite. It would permanently hand over war making power to the president, and Congress would never get it back. It would allow this president and the next president to send our troops almost anywhere in the world for virtually any justifiable reason with no ability of the people's branch of the federal government, this Congress, to step in and have our say."

This is far too much power to give any POTUS. And look by who and when this bill is being proposed. This bill is being proposed by certified RINO's (Mitch McConnell/ Lindsey Graham) while the nation is distracted with a very heated presidential primary season. The bill is being proposed now because 2 candidates we know for sure, Cruz & Paul, would be standing in the well of the Senate thundering away against this power grab are absent preparing for an important presidential debate before Iowa.

Now lets go back to the beginning of this post where I reversed the culprits. Normally I point out establishment as progressives, but this time I said progressives aka establishment. Why? Because a certain candidate who claims to be the anti-establishment candidate just said a few days ago he will become part of establishment to get things done! Said candidate has demonstrated he'll go far beyond the abuse of power our current dictator has gone. Is this AUMF the type of power we want him, or anyone, to have especially when we know, by his past actions, this person in particular will viciously attack and try to destroy his enemies? Is this the type of power we would want to give to Hillary Clinton or barack obama!? Do we want anyone to have so much power they can deploy US troops ANYWHERE without Congressional approval to take out those they deem our enemies?

We need to know more about this bill for sure but on the surface as Sen Murphy outlines this is a very bad AUMF resolution. Keep in mind democrats generally like this sort of power grab but here we have a dem senator warning the dangers this one poses!!

We need to elect leaders in the Senate, House and White House who will stand firm to the Constitution and not welcome gifts of power from radicals within our govt.

Dem Senator Promises ‘Change is Going to Happen’ on Gun Control

Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy is calling for Congressional action to curb gun violence pushing anti-gun lobby talking points mainly universal background checks. First off background checks are already performed during a gun purchase from a licensed dealer be it at a brick and mortar shop, online retailer AND at a gun show. The only time that does not happen is between private parties; the infamous "gun show loophole", but it can happen anywhere again between private parties.

If you want to buy/ sell or transfer a gun from a friend, neighbor, acquaintance, family member etc dems want background checks run. That's right if your grandfather wants to give you his gun or you want to buy your brothers gun they want a background check run! This will not stop a maniac from killing people.

There are thousands of gun laws on the books not being enforced, just like immigration law. On almost all of the recent high-profile mass killings there were plenty of warning signs and agencies who FAILED to follow the law to stop the killers. Enter the calls for a universal background check, which is really coded language for universal registration.

Dems know there are no laws to stop the insane. So they have to build a bridge with additional legislation to get them to universal registration. Ann Coulter said it perfectly "universal registration means universal confiscation – universal extermination. That’s how it goes in history do not fall for “universal background checks”!” That is it folks that's all dems like Murphy to obama and Clinton want with their calls to take action. And now they have the wind on their back after the on-air execution of Alison Parker and Adam Ward. Parker's father is vowing to make something happen, he is what the dems have been waiting for!

Dem Sen Makes Outlandish Claim Blaming US For Creation of Islamic State

"Put simply ISIL in its current form would not exist if we had not put massive ground troops into the region in the first place. Our presence in Iraq, our mishandling of the occupation became bulletin board material for terrorist recruiters..."

Sooo "extremists" (yep he jumped on the lump them all together bandwagon) are like flatworms where you think you killed one and now you have two?! Killing them makes them stronger?! Uh huh... what should we do Congressmen, have a sit down with these killers and ask them to leave us alone? For the record this fight between islamic extremists and the US started in the 18th century. What is the correct tool or tactic to use to stop a bunch of monsters hell-bent on world domination who haven't stopped close to 1000 years?

Dem Sen Murphy like a good progressive covers himself saying the US and our troops are not responsible for the evil ideology yet a minute before he was clear to blame the US for the rise of ISIL following the "invasion" and "occupation" of Iraq. This blame Bush thing is so old especially when dems get creative not using his name but still suggest it. Dems were all on-board with taking Saddam out and hitting other locations islamic terrorists have infested but will never admit their policies restrict our military from doing what they are trained to do, to kill the enemy. No no our trained killers have to fight nice and then get involved with nation building vs wiping all the islamic extremists out and coming home!

I think it's safe to say this guy has flatworms in his head!

(Side note: Curious choice he uses to ID them. Does Murphy mean it or does he use ISIL in manner obama does to dismiss them?).