NYT Hack Claims There Hasn't Been a "Single Instance" of Self-Defense With Guns

The Left has been in overdrive since the Las Vegas Attack and now energized after the Sutherland Springs massacre to make the argument for more gun control. These people will never stop until their real objective is met: complete and total disarmament and confiscation of every single civilian owned weapon. The fact that weapons have been used in self-defense and are rarely reported is no surprise. This of course gives hacks like the NYT's Brett Stephens all the ammo he needs to claim "not a single instance"

We know otherwise as reported on this site and many others of good guys with guns stopping bad guys with guns. Open up any issue of the NRA magazine and you will see a page dedicated to multiple stories of guns being used to stop crimes, even violent ones. Don't get the magazine? That's okay you can go through 538 pages of stories here!

The Clackamas Mall in 2012 is a story that was quickly buried by the media that could have been a deadly massacre right before Christmas.

The attack in Sutherland Springs, is especially important, as the killer was well armed where he would have at the least gotten into a gunfight with police. The man who stopped the killer, Stephen Willeford, destroyed all the Lefts talking points by being an NRA firearms instructor, using an AR-15 (force met with equal force), and a religious man! In a nutshell he is one of those people who is clinging to his bible and guns obama enjoyed mocking, and thank God he did! These stories destroy the Left's argument to more gun control.

Will Stephens ever admit to cases of self-defense with a gun? Of course not he wants you disarmed, defenseless to violent criminals who will never follow any law. Remember the Left HATES YOU, they make it abundantly clear everyday with their attacks on good law abiding Americans.

New York Times "Journalist" Who Broke Comey Memo Admits He Never Saw It

New York Times, Michael Schmidt appeared on LYING Brian Williams 11th Hour admitting he has never seen the alleged Comey memo story he broke this week. Let that sit in for a minute. The entire news entertainment, destroy Trump, industrial complex are setting their hopes on something NO ONE has ever seen! A document we have no idea when it was written, that would in fact incriminate Comey for not reporting "obstruction" to the DOJ back in Feb, as he is required by law, and it would also make him guilty of perjury in front of the US Senate!!

The left is dumber than a box of rocks at this point, let them continue with this witch hunt. There is NO evidence of a law being broken. Even if Robert Mueller was to discover evidence of collusion or the like by the left's book, per Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz, collusion is not a crime!!

Rep Castro: President Trump Should Be Impeached

Democrats are absolutely desperate to find something anything to justify impeaching Pres Trump. To be clear this alleged memo has not been seen by anyone including the NY Times who reported it!

How could Trump be obstructing justice if the FBI investigation has been ongoing since this alleged request? And to be clear it hasn't stopped since Comey rightfully being fired either! So again where's the obstruction and exactly how can the minority party impeach the President?!

They can't, dems are only doing this to amp up their base. This is all political posturing, they have nothing now as they did with every leak that comes out. Get used to hearing about these attacks, this is how it's going to be for the next 4 years.

New York Times Releasing Trump's Taxes Helped Expose A Lot of Hypocrites

I've sat back and watched people fight over the NYT releasing Trump's taxes from 1995, showing he didn't pay federal taxes as the result of a $916M loss. It is astounding how so many on both sides of the aisle who hate the tax code have exposed themselves as total hypocrites.

How many of you bitching about Trump have done everything you can to reduce your tax exposure (personal and business)? How many of you ask whomever prepares your taxes (personal and business) what and how many deductions you qualify for? What makes you think you can do everything you can to be at a zero tax burden but not him? The tax code that applies to Trump also applies to you and so does ALL the LEGAL loopholes.

You people complaining on both sides of the aisle are not only a bunch of hypocrites but stupid! If you want someone to blame, blame Washington for all the loopholes and escape hatches they wrote into the 80K page tax code. Blame yourselves for re-electing these people who have left their fingerprints all over the tax code. You do understand whatever Trump took advantage of #1 is LEGAL #2 the SOB's who wrote the loophole took advantage of it too (before he did) and #3 there is nothing saying you can't take advantage of it either! Spend the money get someone who really knows what they're doing to do your taxes. There are some tax-wizards out there who can get you your money back, reducing your tax burden as close to zero as possible and it's all 100% LEGAL. You're stupid if you prepare your own taxes. And no you do not need to hire an army of accountants and lawyers to do it, you just need to work your network of contacts and maybe that old phone book collecting dust somewhere in your home. There are some very good tax preparers out there who spend a fortune on the software they use to be up-to-date with the current code.

All of you bitching that you want to see Trump's taxes, how about you cough up your tax returns!? Let's see how much you're paying!? That means you Van Jones after the little hissy fit you threw...

...Let's see how much in taxes you're paying! Since you're so big on socialism and communism ranting to "share the wealth", you better be paying more than you're obligated! You better not have any deductions you hypocrite; and that goes for the rest of you bitching!

Simple solution to end all of this bickering is to abolish the 16th Amendment and institute a FLAT tax. No not a fair tax, because it will never be fair and open the door to attack the rich aka job creators. We go to a flat tax all the loopholes and lobbysists will go bye bye and everyone will be paying the same rate... that's the only way we will ever have a "fair tax"!

Oh one last thing, Sep 26th at the debate Hillary said Trump hasn't paid any taxes and what do you know a few days later the NYT comes out with that article. How did Hillary know? This just goes to show the collusion between the MSM (tv & print) and the DNC/ HRC!  

Saudis Threaten US Over Bill to Allow 9/11 Victims to Sue

With the this threat to sell off $750B in US assets Congress more than ever must pass a bill that will allow 9/11 victims and their families to sue foreign govts like the Saudis. Many Americans have no doubt the Saudis hands are covered in blood playing a role in the worst terror attack in US history. Americans don't want their dirty blood covered money.

The US is sitting on more oil and other energy related natural resources than the Saudis, we don't need them. Let them sell off the assets, we need to take these economic hits anyway, the sooner the better, and in the bigger picture it would mean the Saudis won't have America by the balls anymore. They aren't our friends and never were, remember the heart of radical islam is Wahhabism that came from Saudi Arabia.




Saudi Arabia Warns of Economic Fallout if Congress Passes 9/11 Bill
by Mark Mazzett|NYT
WASHINGTON — Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration and members of Congress that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The Obama administration has lobbied Congress to block the bill’s passage, according to administration officials and congressional aides from both parties, and the Saudi threats have been the subject of intense discussions in recent weeks between lawmakers and officials from the State Department and the Pentagon. The officials have warned senators of diplomatic and economic fallout from the legislation.

Adel al-Jubeir, the Saudi foreign minister, delivered the kingdom’s message personally last month during a trip to Washington, telling lawmakers that Saudi Arabia would be forced to sell up to $750 billion in treasury securities and other assets in the United States before they could be in danger of being frozen by American courts.

Several outside economists are skeptical that the Saudis will follow through, saying that such a sell-off would be difficult to execute and would end up crippling the kingdom’s economy. But the threat is another sign of the escalating tensions between Saudi Arabia and the United States.

The administration, which argues that the legislation would put Americans at legal risk overseas, has been lobbying so intently against the bill that some lawmakers and families of Sept. 11 victims are infuriated. In their view, the Obama administration has consistently sided with the kingdom...read more

Liberal Media Coming to Trumps Defense Should Be Red Flag to GOP Voters

Here we have Chris "Tingles" Matthews attacking Ted Cruz pulling the McCarthyism card because Cruz questions Trump's tax situation(suggesting potential mob ties). Why is the liberal media coming to Trump's, a GOP candidate, defense?!

Trump supporters for a min consider this... does it make any sense to you the liberal left defends Trump? Since when has it been a good thing when libs are picking GOP candidates? They want a candidate who is closest to their views. They want a GOP candidate they think will be easy to beat against whomever they nominate, its not the other way around. In a sane world this would normally be a huge red flag!

You've heard some of the things coming out against Trump from die-hard conservatives who are rightfully vetting him that upset you. That's right now from what's been discovered so far, God only knows what the left is sitting on.

Case in point, there is an alleged off-the-record recording the New York Times is in possession of on Trumps immigration stance. YOU KNOW there is no love lost between Trump and the NYT who he trashes A LOT. Why would they sit on this audio unless they are waiting for him to get the nomination and then join the rest of the liberal media to destroy him. Do you really want to say/ refer to Pres Clinton for the next 4 years?! Do you have any idea the hell that will come from her radical regime?

Come on Trump supporters get out of this spell he has you under. When you have hardcore progressive radicals like Chris Matthews coming to Trump's defense you should be running to the hills from him as fast as you can!