Comey Memo Doctored by FBI to Exonerate Hillary - Video

Senior leadership at the DOJ and FBI are completely compromised. The backlash.. damage control coming from the Left would have never happened had Clinton won the election. They were banking on Hillary becoming POTUS so everything they've been up to would remain buried.

We have people we're suppose to entrust to bring Law and Order to America engaged in cover up. These people are dirty, it goes beyond protecting Clinton, they did it to cover up everything they have had a hand in that put money in their pocket ie Uranium One. Money is the Number 1 motivator for people act out so suspiciously as we've seen from Comey, McCabe, Weissmann, Rosenstein etc. Is there no one who can investigate these people? Surely there have been promises made for high position jobs and large payoffs. What other explanation could there be for exonerating Clinton? Does anyone really believe Comey & co did everything we've learned to date just because they like Hillary? No. There is more going on, it's only a matter of time until someone trips up.

---

FBI Edits To Clinton Exoneration Go Far Beyond What Was Previously Known; Comey, McCabe, Strzok Implicated
Zerohedge
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has discovered that edits made to former FBI Director James Comey's statement exonerating Hillary Clinton for transmitting classified info over an unsecured, private email server went far beyond what was previously known, as detailed in a Thursday letter from committee chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) to FBI Director Christopher Wray.

The letter reveals specific edits made by senior FBI agents when Deputy Director Andrew McCabe exchanged drafts of Comey's statement with senior FBI officials, including Peter Strzok, Strzok's direct supervisor, E.W. "Bill" Priestap, Jonathan Moffa, and an unnamed employee from the Office of General Counsel (identified by Newsweek as DOJ Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson) - in what was a coordinated conspiracy among top FBI brass to decriminalize Clinton's conduct by changing legal terms and phrases, omitting key information, and minimizing the role of the Intelligence Community in the email investigation. Doing so virtually assured that then-candidate Hillary Clinton would not be prosecuted.

Also mentioned in the letter are the immunity agreements granted by the FBI in June 2016 to top Obama advisor Cheryl Mills and aide Heather Samuelson - who helped decide which Clinton emails were destroyed before turning over the remaining 30,000 records to the State Department. Of note, the FBI agreed to destroy evidence on devices owned by Mills and Samuelson which were turned over in the investigation...more

New York Times "Journalist" Who Broke Comey Memo Admits He Never Saw It

New York Times, Michael Schmidt appeared on LYING Brian Williams 11th Hour admitting he has never seen the alleged Comey memo story he broke this week. Let that sit in for a minute. The entire news entertainment, destroy Trump, industrial complex are setting their hopes on something NO ONE has ever seen! A document we have no idea when it was written, that would in fact incriminate Comey for not reporting "obstruction" to the DOJ back in Feb, as he is required by law, and it would also make him guilty of perjury in front of the US Senate!!

The left is dumber than a box of rocks at this point, let them continue with this witch hunt. There is NO evidence of a law being broken. Even if Robert Mueller was to discover evidence of collusion or the like by the left's book, per Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz, collusion is not a crime!!

Watch Tucker Sit Back Allowing Krystal Ball to Embarrass Herself With Crazy Reasons to Impeach Trump

Tucker and former Dem congressional candidate Krystal Ball tangle over the left's 'hystericai,' perhaps premature, calls for Trump's impeachment over alleged obstruction of justice in the Mike Flynn case

This segment is entertaining to say the least. Krystal Ball, representing the rabid left, demonstrates she (like all dems) has absolutely no clue what she is talking about, jumping from one gripe to another, that makes Tucker break out laughing.

The left rants daily about about the Trump-Russian connection, where to this day they have not produced one shred of evidence. They scream for impeachment after every legal action Pres Trump has taken, including sharing intel (laptop plot) with Russia that the media (ALL of them) had already covered back in March!! For the record it was the New York Times who revealed Israel was the intel source not Trump that Ball conveniently leaves out!

At no time during this entire interview did Ball produce any solid indisputable facts or evidence for her argument. Instead she tells Tucker "we" have news media that have "reported" on issues so that's what makes them fact! News mind you based on anonymous sources which we all know don't exist. Ball cites the Comey memos as proof as well to impeach the President. What memos? What is she talking about? NO ONE has seen these alleged memos and if anything the memos could very well land Comey in jail!! This dolt and that is what she is making this absurd statement based on nothing, along with the corrupt dem party and media have already convicted Trump with NO evidence of wrongdoing.

Frankly, we should encourage the left to push this narrative and move forward with impeaching Trump. They won't get the votes to pull it off and will most likely destroy whats left of the democ.. communist party.

As for Ball, it's mind-boggling how someone so spaced out has a job and folks like myself are unemployed!

If Trump Obstructed Investigation Then Why Didn't Comey Report It to DOJ & Lie to Senate Judiciary Committee?

Libs are so quick to jump on anything they think will be grounds to impeach Pres Trump. They have embraced an alleged memo from James Comey, no one has seen yet the NY Times has run with as if it is the greatest historical find, suggesting Pres Trump asked Comey to stop investigating Michael Flynn.

First off, based on what's been reported there was no obstruction indicated. If Trump had said to Comey "end the investigation or I'll fire you" then yes that would be grounds, but based on what's been heard through the NYT's grapevine there's nothing there. Don't take my word for it, liberal Constitutional scholar Prof Jonathan Turley spelled that out...

Furthermore, Comey has a legal obligation to immediately report any acts of obstruction to the DOJ per federal law. Not take notes about it, sit on them for 2 mos only to share them with friends or whomever who tell a NY Times reporter what "you" thought completely out of context!

That said if we play along with the dems that Trump has obstructed an investigation (that is still ongoing), then why did Comey tell the Senate Judicial Committee he's never seen a higher authority stop an investigation?

"Sen Hirono: So if the Attorney General or senior officials at the Department of Justice opposes a specific investigation, can they halt that FBI investigation?
Comey: In theory yes.
Sen Hirono: Has it happened?
Comey: Not in my experience. Because it would be a big deal to tell the FBI to stop doing something that -- without an appropriate purpose. I mean where oftentimes they give us opinions that we don't see a case there and so you ought to stop investing resources in it. But I'm talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal.
It's not happened in my experience."

So what are we to conclude? If Comey's memo is, as dems suggest, a clear indication the Pres was obstructing justice, then can we also make the leap that Comey lied to the Senate under oath! Comey could have just opened the door to being charged with perjury!

Jim Comey was rightfully fired by Pres Trump. EVERYONE including democrats were calling for it. What we are seeing now is a school yard fight which the dems are using for 2018 midterms. Yep, if it hasn't clicked what they're doing right now is campaigning for the next election because nothing is going to happen.

Rep Castro: President Trump Should Be Impeached

Democrats are absolutely desperate to find something anything to justify impeaching Pres Trump. To be clear this alleged memo has not been seen by anyone including the NY Times who reported it!

How could Trump be obstructing justice if the FBI investigation has been ongoing since this alleged request? And to be clear it hasn't stopped since Comey rightfully being fired either! So again where's the obstruction and exactly how can the minority party impeach the President?!

They can't, dems are only doing this to amp up their base. This is all political posturing, they have nothing now as they did with every leak that comes out. Get used to hearing about these attacks, this is how it's going to be for the next 4 years.